Patagonia leads environmentally with its use of preferred materials and renewable energy and socially with its labor practices, but its transparency is at-times lacking, also reflected by its low rank in the Fashion Transparency Index.
1. Environmental
Sustainability
Patagonia is a pioneer in environmental sustainability, setting benchmarks in corporate responsibility and committing to organic cotton sourcing as early as 1996. It has phased out virgin petroleum fabrics in favor of recycled materials, though accurate data regarding its emissions targets and fiber portfolio is difficult to find.
IMPACT AREA 01
Materials
& Sourcing
- The raw material composition and all item-level certifications are fully transparent and available online for all of Patagonia’s products.
- Patagonia uses a significant (>90%) share of preferred materials in its products, with recycled polyester and organic cotton being some of its most used fibers. The benefits of the former are debated, as almost all recycled polyester is derived from plastic bottles. Thus, it competes with closed-loop recycling systems in the food industry.
- Patagonia was one of the three founding companies of the Regenerative Organic Alliance (ROA), which created a new organic standard with added benefits for carbon sequestration, soil health, biodiversity, and water retention.
- Patagonia was among the first brands to sign the CanopyStyle pledge to eliminate wood sourcing from ancient and endangered forests.
IMPACT AREA 02
Climate
& Emissions
- Patagonia’s annual emissions totaled 199,357 tCO2e in 2023, with 98.5% classified as Scope 3. It has set 2 near-term emissions reduction targets validated by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 80% and Scope 3 by 55% by 2030 (2017 base year). It also has a validated long-term target to reduce Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by 90% by 2040 (2017 base year).
- Patagonia’s 2017 baseline emissions data is unavailable, limiting its accountability regarding these targets. Since the earliest available data in 2020, it has reduced its Scope 1 emissions by 1%, Scope 2 by 59%, and Scope 3 by 10.4%.
- Patagonia has set a renewable energy use target for its global owned-and-operated facilities to use 100% renewable energy by 2025. It does not provide regular progress updates.
- Patagonia submitted a joint letter to the governor of California supporting the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (Senate Bill 253), requiring brands to report Scope 1, 2, and eventually, Scope 3 emissions.
IMPACT AREA 03
Water
& Chemicals
- Patagonia is a Bluesign System Partner, accessing its tools and support to ensure chemical integrity, monitor supplier compliance, and ensure sustainable chemical practices throughout its supply chain.
- Patagonia committed to eliminating intentionally added toxic fluorinated Durable Water Repellent (DWR), a water-resistant coating, by 2025 and achieved a 99% elimination by Q3 2024.
- Patagonia has proactively phased out several hazardous chemicals, including phthalates, from its production process. While PFAS are still in use, the brand is committed to eliminating them by 2025.
- No quantifiable water reduction targets, water usage data, or specific supplier-level water conservation initiatives could be identified.
IMPACT AREA 04
Circularity
& Waste
- Patagonia operates a clothing take-back, repair, and resale program called “Patagonia Worn Wear.” Unlike most other brands, it displays its resale items on the same page as new products, under separate “Shop Used” and “Shop New” tabs, promoting circularity to a wide range of users.
- Patagonia actively works to identify new end-of-life solutions for apparel and footwear, including participation in fiber-to-fiber recycling initiatives and investing in new technical innovations.
- Patagonia is committed to eliminating virgin petroleum-based materials by the end of 2025, transitioning entirely to recycled alternatives. However, this includes recycled polyester, a fiber that is not fully circular.
- Patagonia provides product care information to help extend the lifespan of its products.
- Microplastic particles are a risk due to the brand's reliance on synthetic materials for its technical gear and clothing.